Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview of the literature on the association between cardiac biomarkers and cardiac radiation exposure. (Note: The criteria for inclusion were: (a) patients with breast cancer had to be treated with radiotherapy, and; (b) any cardiac biomarker was tested to determine its association with radiotherapy. Studies which measured biomarker change in relation to chemotherapy alone or were performed in animals, were excluded.)

From: Cardiac markers in left-sided breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy: a prospective study

Author, year [Ref]

Design

n

Population

RT dosea

Techniquea

Anthracycline/

Anti-Her2 therapy

Mean (SD) Heart Dmean

Biomarkers measured

Biomarker measurement timepoints

Reported findings on the

association of biomarkers with cardiac dosimetry

Commentsc

Studies without reported Heart Dmean

 Hughes-Davies et al., 1995 [13]

Prospective

50

Left Breast cancer

45-46 Gy/23-25Fx + boost

Conventional Photon

Not Available

NR

TnT

Pre-RT and immediately post-RT

No association of TnT with estimated cardiac irradiation (< 10%)

Indirect estimation of irradiated cardiac volume

 Wondergem et al., 2001 [14]

Case–control; retrospective case selection

188

Breast cancer (48; L/R = NR), Hodgkin’s lymphoma (73) vs Healthy Controls (67)

50-60 Gy/20-30Fx

Conventional Photon

Not Available

NRb

ANP

9.5 years (mean; SD = 0.9) post-RT

ANP elevated with estimated cardiac irradiation (20–30%) compared to control group. Elevated ANP associated with CVD

Multi-variable analysis of predictors for ANP not performed. Indirect estimation of irradiated cardiac volume

 D’Errico et al., 2015 [18]

Prospective

59

Left breast cancer

40-50 Gy/15-25Fx

3DCRT

Permitted

NRd

TnI, BNP

Pre-RT, during RT, immediately post-RT and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months post-RT

Heart V50% was associated with normalised BNP at 1 year. e

No association with TnI

Logistic regression performed after dosimetric variables and BNP at 1 year were categorised (full model NR). Analysis of absolute measurements not performed. No correction for multiple comparisons

 Chalubinska-Fendler et al., 2019 [23]

Case–control; Prospective

51

Left breast cancer

50-66 Gy/25-33Fx

3DCRT

Permitted

NR

LBP, TnT,

NT-proBNP, FABP, CRP

Pre-RT, immediately after RT and 1 month after RT

LBP levels were associated with cardiac dosimetry on multivariable linear regression. No association of other biomarkers with cardiac dosimetry

-

 Aula et al., 2020 [25]

Prospective

63

Breast cancer (L/R = 50/13)

50 Gy/25Fx ± boost or 42.6 Gy/16Fx

3DCRT

Not Permitted

NRb

sST2,

Pre-RT, immediately after RT and 3 months after RT

Patients with > 15% worsening in global longitudinal strain (GLS)(14/63) on echocardiography showed a significant increase in ST2 levels. No association of biomarkers with cardiac dosimetry

Logistic regression performed after patients were categorised based on GLS cut-off of 15%. Analysis of absolute measurements with dosimetric variables not performed

Studies with reported Heart Dmean

 Erven et al., 2012 [15]

Prospective

75

Breast cancer

(L/R = 51/24)

50 Gy/25Fx ± boost

3DCRT, mixed photon-electron or electrons

Permitted

9.0 (4.0)b

TnI

Pre-RT and immediately post-RT

TnI levels were significantly elevated post-RT in left-sided patients

Multi-variable analysis of predictors for TnI not performed

 D’Errico et al., 2012 [16]

Case–control; retrospective case selection

60

Left breast cancer (30, Pre-RT vs 30, Post RT)

40-50 Gy/15-25Fx + boost

3DCRT

Permitted

2.5 (1.2)

TnI, NT-proBNP

11.2 months (mean; SD = 4.2) post-RT

No correlation of cardiac dosimetry with overall post-RT NT-proBNP or TnI

Small sample size. Association of post-RT NT-proBNP with cardiac dosimetry was established on a small subgroup (8/30) of patients

 Skyttä et al., 2015 [17]

Prospective

58

Left breast cancer or DCIS

50 Gy/25Fx ± boost or 42.6 Gy/16Fx

3DCRT

Not Permitted

3.0 (1.4)

hsTnT, BNP

Pre-RT, during RT and immediately post-RT

Patients with hsTnT rise > 30% (12/58) had higher heart Dmean. No association with BNP

Exclusion of chemotherapy limits generalisability

 Palumbo et al., 2015 [19]

Prospective

43

Left breast cancer

50–50.4 Gy/25-28Fx ± boost

3DCRT

Not Permitted

2.4 (0.8)

BNP

Pre-RT and 1, 6, 12 months post-RT

Normalised BNP at 1 month,, 6 months and 1 year post-RT were associated with cardiac dosimetry. e No association with absolute BNP levels

Small sample size. Exclusion of chemotherapy limits generalisability

 Skyttä et al., 2019 [20]

Prospective

80

Breast cancer or DCIS

(L/R = 60/20)

50 Gy/25Fx ± boost or 42.6 Gy/16Fx

3DCRT

Not Permitted

3.1 (1.5)b

hsTnT, NT-proBNP

Pre-RT, immediately after RT and 3 years after RT

No association of biomarkers with cardiac dosimetry

Exclusion of chemotherapy limits generalisability

 Demissei et al., 2019 [21]

Prospective

87

Breast cancer (60; L/R = NR),

Lung Cancer (13), Mediastinal lymphoma (14)

Conventional fractionation)

Photon (technique NR) or Protons

Permitted

1.5 (1.1)b

hsTnT,

NT-proBNP, PIGF, GDF-15

Pre-RT and a median of 20 days post-RT (IQR 1–35)

No association of biomarkers with cardiac dosimetry in breast cancer patients

PIGF and GDF-15 associated with cardiac dosimetry in lung and lymphoma group, though sample size was small. Analysis for left breast not performed

 Yu et al., 2019 [22]

Retrospective

47

Her2 + breast cancer

(L/R = 26/21)

50 Gy/25Fx or 42.4 Gy/16Fx ± boost

3DCRT or IMRT

Permitted

1.8 (1.5)b

hsTnI

Baseline (Pre-Chemotherapy), Pre-RT, immediately post-RT and 6 months post-RT

Statistical analysis not performed due to incomplete data on paired samples

-

 De Sanctis et al., 2020 [24]

Prospective

44

Breast cancer (L/R = 27/17)

42.4 Gy/16Fx ± boost

3DCRT

Permitted

1.3 (NR)b

hsTnI, NT-proBNP

Pre-RT, during RT, immediately post-RT and 12 months post-RT

No association of biomarkers with cardiac dosimetry

Heart Dmean not used for linear mixed modelling. Small sample size

 Speers et al., 2021 [26]

Prospective

51

Left breast cancer

50 Gy/25Fx ± boost

3DCRT or IMRT

Permitted

2.0 (NR)

hsTnI, NT-proBNP, hsCRP, ET-1, IL-6, Lipid Profile f

Pre-RT, immediately after RT and 3 months after RT

IL-6 immediately after completing RT, associated with heart Dmean. No association of other biomarkers with cardiac dosimetry

Multi-variable analyses of predictors for biomarkers not performed

  1. aIn studies with different populations, RT dose and technique for only breast cancer patients are shown here
  2. bIn studies which included both left- and right-sided breast cancer patients or included different populations, the reported mean of only left-sided patients are shown here
  3. cNone of the studies performed a power and sample size calculation, except Chalubinska-Fendler et al., 2019
  4. dHeart Dmean for the population was split into tertiles and reported
  5. e Normalised refers to converting the absolute value at a time point to a ratio, by dividing it by the baseline value
  6. f Lipid profile included cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoproteins and low-density lipoproteins
  7. Abbreviations: ANP Atrial Natriuretic Peptide, 3DCRT 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy, BNP Brain Natriuretic Peptide, CRP C-Reactive Protein, CVD Cardio-Vascular Disease, DCIS Ductal Carcinoma In-Situ, ET-1 Endothelin-1, FABP Fatty Acid Binding Protein, Fx Fractions, GDF-15 Growth Differentiation Factor 15, Gy Gray, hsTnI High Sensitivity Troponin I, hsTnT High Sensitivity Troponin T, IL-6 Interleukin-6, IMRT Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Technique, IQR Inter-Quartile Range, LBP Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein,  L/R Left/Right, NR Not Reported, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, PIGF Placental Growth Factor, RT Radiotherapy, SD Standard Deviation, sST2 soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2, TnI Troponin I, TnT Troponin T